Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are an excellent choice for rapid development, prototyping, and low-volume production. But as products mature and volumes increase, many organizations reach a tipping point were continuing with an FPGA is no longer the most efficient or cost-effective option.
So how do you know when it’s time to make the move?
Below are 7 clear signs that your design may be ready for FPGA-to-ASIC conversion and how making the transition can improve performance, reduce costs, and ensure long-term supply.
1. Your Production Volumes Are Increasing
FPGAs are ideal for low-to-medium volumes, but their per-unit cost remains relatively high compared to ASICs. If your production volumes are scaling into the thousands (or more), an ASIC can significantly reduce unit cost over time.
ASICs have higher upfront development costs (NRE), but much lower per-unit pricing, making them more economical at scale.
2. Power Consumption Is Becoming a Problem
FPGAs typically consume more power than ASICs because of their programmable architecture.
ASICs are optimized for a specific function, resulting in lower power consumption and improved efficiency, critical for embedded, industrial, and defense systems.
3. Performance Limitations Are Holding You Back
As system demands increase, FPGA performance may become a bottleneck.
ASICs offer higher speed and optimized performance, enabling designs that FPGAs simply can’t match in demanding applications.
4. Your Design Has Stabilized
FPGAs are valuable during early development because they allow for flexibility and reprogramming. If your design is no longer changing significantly, that flexibility becomes less important. Once stable, converting to an ASIC allows you to optimize cost, power, and performance without sacrificing functionality.
5. Component Obsolescence Is a Growing Risk
FPGA devices, especially older families, can become obsolete, creating long-term supply challenges.
ASIC conversion gives you greater control over lifecycle and supply, reducing dependency on commercial FPGA product cycles.
6. You Need Long-Term Product Support (10–30+ Years)
Many industries, especially aerospace, defense, and industrial, require systems to remain operational for decades.
FPGAs are typically not designed for such long lifecycles.
ASICs can be supported with long-term manufacturing strategies, ensuring continuity and reducing the risk of forced redesigns.
7. Your Total Cost of Ownership Is Too High
The true cost of using an FPGA goes beyond the unit price.
Hidden costs include:
An ASIC can reduce overall system cost, not just component cost, especially in high-volume or long-life applications.
SUMMARY
FPGA vs. ASIC: Quick Comparison
|
Factor |
FPGA |
ASIC |
|
Upfront Cost |
Low |
High (NRE) |
|
Unit Cost |
High |
Low (at scale) |
|
Power Consumption |
Higher |
Lower |
|
Performance |
Moderate |
High |
|
Flexibility |
High |
Fixed |
|
Lifecycle Control |
Limited |
High |
Converting from FPGA to ASIC isn’t just a technical decision, it’s a strategic move that can:
Tekmos provides a unique advantage for organizations considering FPGA-to-ASIC conversion, especially in high-reliability and long-lifecycle applications.
Key Benefits of Working with Tekmos
With Tekmos, companies can confidently transition from FPGA to ASIC while minimizing risk and maximizing long-term value.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ASIC conversion expensive?
It requires upfront investment but often reduces total cost over the product lifecycle.
Can FPGA designs be directly converted to ASICs?
In many cases, yes, but optimization and validation are required.
How long does FPGA-to-ASIC conversion take?
Timelines vary depending on complexity, but it typically ranges from several months to over a year.
Considering FPGA-to-ASIC conversion? Tekmos offers turn-key solutions designed to optimize performance, reduce costs, and ensure long-term supply for mission-critical applications.
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Kelsey Casto, Director of Quality
Kelsey joined Tekmos in 2014 and currently serves as the Director of Quality. Kelsey is responsible for the implementation of the AS9100 Rev. D Quality Management System.
Originally from The Woodlands, TX Kelsey received her Bachelor degree from Texas State University, San Marcos in Manufacturing Engineering with a concentration in Mechanical Systems and a minor in Applied Mathematics.